Aliens/UFOs, Fallen Angels, Nephilim, the Flood, the Bible, Transhumanism, and the Illuminati. Yes, They All Tie Together.
(Note: For those who would prefer to read this post in hard copy, it is Chapter Nine of my book Thirteen Pieces of the Jigsaw.)
Those familiar with my writing know I have never written an article or post on aliens and UFOs. In Chapter 22 of Truth Is a Lonely Warrior, I was pretty content to dismiss them as a high-tech government psyop.
Indeed, there were reasons to take that position. Report from Iron Mountain (1967) was an alleged and credible leaked report of a U.S. government thinktank, whose task had been to find methods of controlling populations in light of the possibility that nuclear weapons might render war impractical as a coercive threat. The group favored environmental threats as the way to go, and in their report’s wake, numerous environmental scares were raised: global warming, acid rain, overpopulation, ozone depletion, toxic waste, deforestation, endangered species, etc. However, the study had also explored the possibility of a simulated UFO attack, but did not think it practical given the existing technology at that time:
Credibility, in fact, lies at the heart of the problem of developing a political substitute for war. . . . The most ambitious and unrealistic space project cannot of itself generate a believable external menace. It has been hotly argued that such a menace would offer the “last, best hope of peace,” etc., by uniting mankind against the danger of destruction by “creatures” from other planets or from outer space. Experiments have been proposed to test the credibility of an out-of-our-world invasion threat; it is possible that a few of the more difficult-to-explain “flying saucer” incidents of recent years were in fact early experiments of this kind. If so, they could hardly have been judged encouraging.1
Faking an alien attack is nothing new: in 1938, Orson Welles did just that. He made media history when he panicked the nation by broadcasting The War of the Worlds on radio as “news reports” of a Martian invasion.
The idea that an alien attack could unite mankind (i.e., accept world government) was voiced by President Ronald Reagan before the UN:
Former President Bill Clinton echoed that perspective on Jimmy Kimmel Live:
On CNN, economist Paul Krugman proposed a fake alien invasion to fix the economy:
Furthermore, the technology necessary to simulate an invasion, which the Iron Mountain group had rejected as inadequate in the 1960s, has obviously stridden far ahead in the half-century since, outlined in some detail by the late Serge Monast in his description of NASA’s Project Blue Beam, by which high tech (such as holograms projected from satellites) would convince people of an impending alien attack, as well as a returned Messiah and other deceptions. I realize Monast has been criticized for not substantiating his claims with hard documentation from NASA, but since he died in 1996 of an alleged heart attack, very shortly after going public with his revelations, I think this criticism itself lacks teeth. Had Monast been alive all these years, evading questions and never following through with a book, his critics would have a stronger platform.
Certainly one point is undeniable: Hollywood has produced a slew of films dramatizing aliens and space travel. The public has been acclimated to the degree that these things seem normal and real. The 1950s saw a rash of “creatures from outer space” B-movies that later went on to serve as unintentional humor for bored late-night TV viewers. All that changed in the 1970s as Hollywood invested countless millions to give the genre a makeover with epics like Close Encounters of the Third Kind, Star Wars and ET, and numerous blockbusters since, such as Alien, Independence Day, and Men in Black.
Because Hollywood is governed by the same financial oligarchy that controls the government, I long believed this sci-fi explosion was probably a run-up to the postulated fake alien invasion. I believed the recent increase in UFO sightings was probably just a reflection of advances in high-tech fakery, funded by a military “black budget.” With all the false flags that have brought America into the interminable Middle East conflicts, why not an alien false flag, with human-zapping extraterrestrials replacing those ISIS beheading videos, to bring us – at last – into world government?
However, after a fellow 9-11 Truther introduced me to the work of L . A. Marzulli, my perspective has changed. Far too many credible witnesses, ranging from pilots to scholars, have encountered not only UFOs, but aliens themselves. A friend of mine who is an Air Force veteran told me of how he and his crew encountered a UFO while on a nighttime bombing mission during the Vietnam War. I do not believe that the UFO/alien phenomena can be dismissed as purely a psyop that has deceived gullible people. I believe we are dealing with a more complex picture, with significant implications for both history and the future.
The Flood and Fallen Angels
“Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it,” is a famous and valid maxim. Fully observing it sometimes requires searching the deep past. For our purposes, we start with the Flood of Noah. In my atheist youth, I regarded it as nothing more than a fairy tale for naïve Sunday School children. But when I began studying creationist literature in the 1990s, I was stunned by the scientific evidence supporting it.
About 75 percent of the rock in the Earth’s geologic column is sedimentary (deposited chiefly by water, like limestone or sandstone). Since the days of Charles Darwin’s close friend Charles Lyell (1797-1875), evolutionary geologists have argued that the geologic layers simply resulted from natural processes visible today – gradual erosion and sedimentation, from oceans covering Earth. This explanation supplied Darwin with the endless millions of years his theory of evolution required in order to work.
However, this claim is belied by the countless billions of fossils found throughout the geologic layers. Most fossils are remains mineralized by sediments. It’s not just bones we find, but soft body parts such as fishes’ fins and scales, jellyfish, worms, and tree leaves. We even have fossils of animals in the act of giving birth and eating each other.
These cannot have been generated by slow sedimentation. When an animal dies, it normally either (1) decomposes, or (2) is devoured by predators, before it can be buried under sediment. That is why so few fossils have been created in recent years. For example, millions of buffaloes were killed in the 19th century, but they left no fossils – scavengers and decomposing bacteria took care of that. Fossilization requires quick burial.
The epic worldwide flood described in the Bible, by churning up billions of tons of sediment, would have resulted in rapid burial of Earth’s living organisms, and explains why innumerable well-preserved fossils are found throughout the world. It also explains why most of the geologic column’s rock is sedimentary. Further reinforcing the Flood are the flood legends of more than 200 cultures.
The Bible says God brought the Flood on Earth, but does not, at first glance, seem to elaborate on why beyond the wickedness of man:
And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually. (Genesis 6:5)
However, much clarification is found in the preceding verses, which are among the Bible’s most controversial:
And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them, that the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose. . . . There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown. (Genesis 6:1, 2, 4)
Many theologians today teach that these “sons of God” were simply godly men who were from the lineage of Seth (the third son of Adam and Eve) and that “sons of men” refers to the “ungodly” line of Cain. However, this view was not taught until the 5th century AD.2 Prior to that, it was understood that these “sons of God” were fallen angels. “Sons of God” was a term used for angels in the Old Testament (e.g., Job 1:6, “Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the Lord, and Satan came also among them.”).
The book of Enoch makes the meaning of Genesis 6 unmistakable. (Enoch is not part of the Bible’s official canon, but the Bible does reference Enoch. The book of Jude, for example, references content of Enoch in verse 6, and verses 14-15 loosely quote Enoch 1:9. Likewise 2 Peter 2:4 references content from Enoch. The book of Enoch is found in the Dead Sea Scrolls, and is part of the Ethiopic canon of scriptures.)
Here is the relevant text – chapters 6 and 7 of the book of Enoch:
And it came to pass when the children of men had multiplied that in those days were born unto them beautiful and comely daughters. And the angels, the children of the heaven, saw and lusted after them, and said to one another: “Come, let us choose us wives from among the children of men and beget us children.” And Semjâzâ, who was their leader, said unto them: “I fear ye will not indeed agree to do this deed, and I alone shall have to pay the penalty of a great sin.” And they all answered him and said: “Let us all swear an oath, and all bind ourselves by mutual imprecations not to abandon this plan but to do this thing.” Then sware they all together and bound themselves by mutual imprecations upon it. And they were in all two hundred; who descended ⌈in the days⌉ of Jared on the summit of Mount Hermon, and they called it Mount Hermon, because they had sworn and bound themselves by mutual imprecations upon it. And these are the names of their leaders: Sêmîazâz, their leader, Arâkîba, Râmêêl, Kôkabîêl, Tâmîêl, Râmîêl, Dânêl, Êzêqêêl, Barâqîjâl, Asâêl, Armârôs, Batârêl, Anânêl, Zaqîêl, Samsâpêêl, Satarêl, Tûrêl, Jômjâêl, Sariêl. These are their chiefs of tens.
And all the others together with them took unto themselves wives, and each chose for himself one, and they began to go in unto them and to defile themselves with them, and they taught them charms and enchantments, and the cutting of roots, and made them acquainted with plants. And they became pregnant, and they bare great giants, whose height was three thousand ells: Who consumed all the acquisitions of men. And when men could no longer sustain them, the giants turned against them and devoured mankind. And they began to sin against birds, and beasts, and reptiles, and fish, and to devour one another’s flesh, and drink the blood. Then the earth laid accusation against the lawless ones.
Likewise, the non-canonical book of Jubilees says:
And it came to pass when the children of men began to multiply on the face of the earth and daughters were born unto them, that the angels of God saw them on a certain year of this jubilee, that they were beautiful to look upon; and they took themselves wives of all whom they chose, and they bare unto them sons and they were giants. And lawlessness increased on the earth and all flesh corrupted its way, alike men and cattle and beasts and birds and everything that walketh on the earth – all of them corrupted their ways and their orders, and they began to devour each other. (Jubilees 5:1–2)
Yes, that was the understanding: fallen angels had sex with women and their offspring were giants. This is apt to trigger objections, so I’ll address two – one theological, the other scientific.
Would Angel-Human Hybrids Be Possible?
Some Christians say that this would be impossible because Jesus said, speaking of the resurrected dead: “For in the resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels of God in heaven.” (Matthew 22:30)
However, Jesus said angels in heaven do not marry. And he did not say sex was impossible for angels. Elsewhere in the Bible, angels manifest bodily functions. For example, in Genesis 18, Abraham prepared a meal for three angels, which they ate.
Likewise, Jesus did not deny that resurrected people have biological functions. When He appeared before his disciples in His own resurrected body, He ate fish and a honeycomb (Luke 24:42-43). Jesus had also told the disciples at the Last Supper, “I will not drink henceforth of this fruit of the vine, until that day when I drink it new with you in my Father’s kingdom.” (Matthew 26:29).
So apparently both angels and resurrected humans can eat and drink; they have functional digestive systems. Could they not also have functional reproductive systems?
The second objection: Would it be scientifically possible for an angel to mate with a human? This question is only loosely “scientific,” since we don’t know enough about angels to soundly answer it based on observations.
However, we know that, in the Bible, angels could assume the appearance of men – so much so that men of Sodom sought sex with the angels who visited Lot (Genesis 19). Thus sexual attraction could occur between the two.
But to reproduce, the angels would require DNA. Is that possible? The question might seem unanswerable. However, all known living organisms have DNA. Like the rest of the world, angels are part of God’s creation. Psalm 8:5 says God made mankind “a little lower than the angels.” That He used DNA in designing angels does not seem that far-fetched.
If angels mated with humans, creating a race of giants, there should be physical remains of giants. In fact, many have been discovered.
L, A. Marzulli, in his book On the Trail of the Nephilim, vol. 1, quotes dozens of newspaper accounts of discoveries of these giants, dating from the 18th to the mid-20th century. In many cases, the bones were sent to the Smithsonian Institution and then . . . never seen again. As Fritz Zimmerman told Marzulli:
A literal army of Smithsonian agents were sent out across the country following up on historic and newspaper reports where giant skeletons were found. These giant remains were gathered up and sent back to Washington, where they were to disappear forever. There have been reports that many of these giant skeletal remains were dumped into the ocean.3
This interview with Richard Dewhurst, author of The Ancient Giants Who Ruled America: The Missing Skeletons and the Great Smithsonian Cover-Up is as good a summary as I’ve heard:
When I wrote Tornado in a Junkyard in 1998, I discovered that much fossil evidence had been suppressed. In that book I quoted, for example, Harvard anthropologist Earnest Hooton: “Heretical and non-conforming fossil men were banished to the limbo of dark museum cupboards, forgotten or even destroyed.”4
A prime reason for concealing “non-conforming fossil men” was that they clashed with Darwin’s theory of evolution. Giants, in particular, flew against the theory, which claimed we had gradually evolved from much smaller tree-dwelling creatures such as lemurs.
However, I now realize there was another reason for destroying the remains of giants: to discredit the specific Biblical texts, which often mention giants. Goliath, who stood well over nine feet tall, is the most famous example, but there are others.
Deuteronomy 3:11 says: “For only Og king of Bashan remained of the remnant of giants; behold, his bedstead was a bedstead of iron; is it not in Rabbath of the children of Ammon? Nine cubits (13 ½ feet) was the length thereof, and four cubits the breadth of it, after the cubit of a man.”
2 Samuel 21:16-20 relates:
And Ishbibenob, which was of the sons of the giant, the weight of whose spear weighed three hundred shekels of brass in weight, he being girded with a new sword, thought to have slain [been intended to slay] David. . . And there was yet a battle in Gath, where was a man of great stature, that had on every hand six fingers, and on every foot six toes, four and twenty in number; and he also was born to the giant.
The above passage is interesting, because a number of discovered giant remains have had six fingers on their hands and six toes on their feet.
Above: a giant skeleton with six fingers, found by L. A. Marzulli in Ralph Glidden’s collection from many decades ago. Marzulli does not Photoshop his work.
Of course, when Moses led the Israelites out of Egypt to enter the Promised Land, they feared to go in because of the giants there:
And they brought up an evil report of the land which they had searched unto the children of Israel, saying, The land, through which we have gone to search it, is a land that eateth up the inhabitants thereof; and all the people that we saw in it are men of a great stature. And there we saw the giants, the sons of Anak, which come of the giants: and we were in our own sight as grasshoppers, and so we were in their sight. (Numbers 13:32-33)
For refusing to enter the Promised Land, of course, God made the Israelites wander in the wilderness for forty years.
The Bible Revisited
The existence of Nephilim may explain archaeological mysteries, such as how the great pyramids, Stonehenge, and other massive structures were built: a workforce of Nephilim. The union between fallen angels and men also gives us insights into the Bible.
Why did God bring the Flood upon the Earth? Apparently it wasn’t just man’s evil. God’s creation was being corrupted. Not only were humans genetically altered (which today we call transhumanism; more on that shortly), but apparently animals were affected as well. The non-canonical book of Jasher says (chapter 4, verse 18) that “the sons of men in those days took from the cattle of the earth, the beasts of the field and the fowls of the air, and taught the mixture of animals of one species with the other, in order therewith to provoke the Lord; and God saw the whole earth and it was corrupt, for all flesh had corrupted its ways upon earth, all men and all animals.”
Previously we quoted the book of Jubilees: “all flesh corrupted its way, alike men and cattle and beasts and birds and everything that walketh on the earth – all of them corrupted their ways and their orders.”
Clearly, God did not erase life forms with the Flood simply out of anger; it was necessary in order to remove the genetically warped creation and start over – i.e., to reboot the planet.
This also clarifies why, when Joshua and the Israelites entered the Promised Land, God commanded them to wipe out the Canaanite tribes there. Some have called this genocide on God’s part. However, besides the demon worship and child sacrifices these peoples were engaged in, the report of giants occupying the land indicates that, once again, God was removing transhumanized people.
How did these post-Flood Canaanite giants arise? Probably the same way as pre-Flood giants: sexual union between fallen angels and people. Genesis 6:4 reports that “There were giants in the earth in those [pre-Flood] days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men. . . .”
This has a spiritual dimension to consider. The Bible says God created man in His image. We know that God’s enemy, Satan, persuaded many angels to follow himself, and that he wants to reign as a counterfeit god. It appears that the mating of fallen angels with women was, at least in part, an attempt by Satan to remake man in his own image.
We also know that before this mating occurred, Satan had lured Adam and Eve into sinning. This is described very early in the Bible (Genesis 3). God then told Satan: “And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.” (Genesis 3:15) Christian theologians widely understand this prophecy to mean the seed of the woman (Jesus Christ) would ultimately destroy Satan (bruise his head), even though Satan would “bruise his heel” (the Crucifixion).
One reason Satan subsequently wanted fallen angels to mix with humans was to eliminate the “seed of the woman” and thus, he hoped, avert his own prophesied destruction. Note that Genesis 3:15 referred to “thy seed” (Satan’s seed).
Since the savior, Jesus Christ, was to be born in the Promised Land (Palestine), it’s apparently no coincidence that when the Israelites arrived there, they found Nephilim (giants) occupying the territory. Once again, Satan was attempting to forestall his own destruction.
The relationship between fallen angels and humans sheds light on yet another controversy: demons, also referred to in the Bible as “evil spirits” and “unclean spirits.” Jesus, of course, cast many demons out of people, and to this day, demonic possession and exorcism are subjects of considerable discussion.
Where did demons come from? Again, the non-canonical book of Enoch sheds light:
But now the giants who are born from the [union of] the spirits and the flesh shall be called evil spirits upon the earth, because their dwelling shall be upon the earth and inside the earth. Evil spirits have come out of their bodies. Because from the day that they were created from the sons of God they became Watchers: their first origin is the spiritual foundation. They will become evil upon the earth and shall be called evil spirits. (Enoch 15:8)
Like humans, Nephilim giants had spirits. But when the Nephilim died, God did not allow their spirits to proceed in the same way that a human soul does upon death. Instead, they became evil spirits, roaming Earth until the final day of God’s judgement.
Sometimes the terms “fallen angel” and “demon” are used interchangeably, and confusion results. They are not the same. Fallen angels mated with humans; demons are the spirits of their offspring, the Nephilim giants. An angel is considerably more powerful than a demon. For those who would like to explore this issue more, I suggest reading the article “The Origin of Demons,” by Pastor Tom Brown.
Today, “As in the Days of Noah”
So what does all this mean for us today, and for the future? And how does it relate to the UFO/alien phenomenon?
Jesus’s disciples asked Him (Matthew 24): ”What shall be the sign of thy coming and of the end of the world?” Part of Jesus’ response was: “As it was in the days of Noah, so it will be at the coming of the Son of Man. For in the days before the flood, people were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, up to the day Noah entered the ark; and they knew nothing about what would happen until the flood came and took them all away. That is how it will be at the coming of the Son of Man.” (Matthew 24:37-39, NIV)
Current events suggest that the phrase “as in the days of Noah” may carry additional significance. As we’ve noted, before the Flood, species – both animals and men – were being altered.
Today, we have genetic engineering on a massive scale. Corporations like Monsanto have changed the genetic makeup of foods, making corn, soy, rice, potatoes and beets into GMOs (genetically modified organisms).
In addition, grotesque experimentation is altering the genetic makeup of animals, as seen in this CNN clip on “glow in the dark” cats:
The hybridization of human genes with animal genes is widely occurring, as related in this NBC News article, “Scientists Create Animals that Are Part-Human.”
It is increasingly clear that we are revisiting what occurred before the Flood. Very possibly the creatures of Greek mythology, such as the centaur (part human, part horse) were not products of imagination, but products of genetic engineering.
Greek mythology may be far less mythological than traditionally believed. Hercules was said to be the son of Zeus and a mortal woman (Alcmene). It’s no leap of logic to see this is a retelling of the union of celestial beings with humans, resulting in Nephilim, whom the Bible also called “mighty men” (Genesis 6:4).
Hollywood seems to be acclimating us for a return of the Nephilim, making countless films about “superheroes.” There is a lot of transhumanism in these characters. Spider-Man, of course, was a teenager genetically modified after a spider bite gave him spider abilities. The Six Million Dollar Man and the Bionic Woman received superhuman powers from bionic surgical implants. DARPA’s plans to create genetically enhanced “super soldiers” prove these concepts are no longer fictional.
The public is being sold genetic engineering on the pretext that altering our genes will improve our health. Actually, we could have better health simply by reducing /eliminating our exposure to: processed foods, GMOs, pharmaceuticals, vaccines, chemtrails and radiation from wi-fi. The Illuminist financial oligarchy, which is obsessed with population reduction, is also funding geoengineering. This reveals that modifying the human genome will ultimately impair our health, not improve it.
Genetic engineering presupposes that God didn’t know what He was doing when He created human beings, animals, and the food we eat. We are supposed to “trust in man,” and let lab scientists rewrite Earth’s gene pools. Of course, this activity is largely founded on the notion that there is no God, that life on Earth arose from a random amalgamation of chemicals which then evolved via Darwinian mechanisms.
So scientists are truly playing God. It is worth pointing out that once they modify the genetic makeup of a creature, and the results eventually prove horrific, there may be no turning back, i.e., no way of restoring the genome to what it originally was. Truly, we are “as in the days of Noah,” corrupting God’s creation. The current heavy promotion of transgenderism (sex change) fits in with this.
Above: one of my favorite cartoons from The New Yorker, 1966
What about aliens? I don’t believe these are creatures traveling here from, as Star Wars put it, “a galaxy far, far away.” I believe we are dealing, once again, with phenomena seen “in the days of Noah.”
The Bible says (Ephesians 6:12): “For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms.” Satan and his fallen angels were a bane to mankind before the Flood, and so they are today.
I realize there is a vast body of discussion about aliens, UFOs, abductions, Roswell, the Dulce Base, cattle mutilations, crop circles and other phenomena. Some people have spent many years researching these areas. I have not, so will confine myself to a few matters that I find especially relevant to this post.
I suggest that when fallen angels descend collectively on this planet again, they will present themselves not as fallen angels, but as extraterrestrial beings. This will be relatively easy to do after the wave of Hollywood movies conditioning us to accept the reality of ETs from “other civilizations.”
The pre-Flood angels were able to impress mankind with their knowledge of new technologies. Enoch, Chapter 8:
Moreover Azazyel taught men to make swords, knives, shields, breastplates, the fabrication of mirrors, and the workmanship of bracelets and ornaments, the use of paint, the beautifying of the eyebrows, the use of stones of every valuable and select kind, and of all sorts of dyes, so that the world became altered. Impiety increased; fornication multiplied; and they transgressed and corrupted all their ways. Amazarak taught all the sorcerers, and dividers of roots; Armers taught the solution of sorcery; Barkayal taught the observers of the stars; Akibeel taught signs; Tamiel taught astronomy; And Asaradel taught the motion of the moon. And men, being destroyed, cried out; and their voice reached to heaven.
If fallen angels return, they will again attempt to win over mankind by impressing us with technology, but they will claim it is merely from another planet that is more highly developed than ours.
I further suggest that when fallen angels arrive as ETs, they will insist that they – not God – created life on Earth (during a previous visit). Fallen angels are, like their leader Satan, enemies of God; destroying people’s faith in God is intrinsic to their agenda.
They will claim they started life on Earth using genetic engineering. With all the genetic engineering now going on, that claim might not seem so far-fetched, would it? (But there is a vast difference between creating life and simply splicing existing genes.) Forty years ago, I was in a New Age cult where it was suggested that aliens designed every feature of life on Earth using computers. This idea remains very trendy. Even Richard Dawkins, probably the leading spokesperson for Darwinism today, has suggested aliens seeded life here, as in this clip (note the hostility he simultaneously expresses toward God):
Those who study realpolitik know that the Powers that Be, in planning their “New World Order,” are after more than money and power. There is a Luciferian agenda at hand, as witnessed by their mock (?) human sacrifices before a 40-foot owl at the annual Bohemian Grove ceremonies.
The Illuminati control the world of arts and entertainment, which is becoming increasingly satanic. As just one example, the annual Super Bowl halftime shows reek of satanic symbols. Madonna dressed as Baphomet for the 2012 show:
The Bible’s book of Revelation speaks of the whore of Babylon: “I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet colored beast, full of names of blasphemy. . .” Katy Perry’s performance at the 2015 Super Bowl may have been intended to mimic the whore of Babylon, even though it didn’t match all the specifics the Bible mentions. She wore a flaming suit, riding a beast with demonic red eyes:
Remember how pre-Flood angels had sex with humans? Check the lyrics to Katy Perry’s song “E.T,” where she sings about having sex with an alien who “could be an angel”:
You’re so hypnotizing
Could you be the devil, could you be an angel
Your touch magnetizing
Feels like I’m floating, leaves my body glowing
They say be afraid
You’re not like the others, futuristic lovers
Different DNA, they don’t understand you
You’re from a whole other world
A different dimension
You open my eyes
And I’m ready to go, lead me into the light
Kiss me, k-k-kiss me
Infect me with your love and fill me with your poison
Take me, t-t-take me
Wanna be a victim, ready for abduction
Boy, you’re an alien, your touch so foreign
Its supernatural, extraterrestrial
(Complete lyrics at http://www.metrolyrics.com/et-lyrics-katy-perry.html. Thanks to L. A. Marzulli for spotting this.)
Note that Perry’s song refers to “abductions.” There are increasing reports, from credible witnesses (not just rednecks who drank too much moonshine) of being abducted by “aliens.” A very common denominator to these abductions is that the individuals undergo forced sexual experiments, including the harvesting of sperm or eggs. There is some sort of breeding program going on; some abductees have reported seeing human-alien hybrids. It appears that fallen angels again have an agenda of creating transhumans, but they are going about it in a different way than before the Flood.
Would an angel have the capacity to abduct a human being? Marzulli draws an astute comparison to the books of Acts, chapter 12, where a good angel supernaturally brought Peter out of prison, making the chains fall off his wrists and the prison door open by itself. At the time, Peter thought he was seeing a vision. It’s an example of what we might call a “beneficent abduction.”
Abductees report seeing three basic types of aliens: (1) the “greys,” small creatures with almond eyes who resemble the alien in the movie ET; (2) reptilians, who look like reptiles, but who can, for limited time periods, “shape-shift” and appear as something else, including humans; and (3) beautiful Nordic types, tall with blond hair and blue eyes.
There are many theories about these types. While I have not studied this deeply and have no firm opinion, I appreciate the suggestion of theologian Gary Stearman: that when angels fall, they initially retain the beauty they had in God’s presence. These would be the Nordics (and it is easy to see how they could have induced women into sexual relationships). However, Stearman believes that as these fallen angels commune with Satan, they gradually degrade and start assuming the appearance of Satan, who the book of Genesis described as a serpent (reptilian).
As to the grey/“ET” types, these are reportedly subordinate to the Nordics and reptilians, and quite different from them. The greys are evil, but they are small, rather weak and vulnerable, and walk robotically. It is to be remembered that while demons (spirits of the deceased Nephilim) are part of the satanic hierarchy, they are not the same as fallen angels. Demons have no body, but are always seeking one to enter. Marzulli believes the grey aliens are actually demons, inhabiting a type of biological body suit that has been developed for them. I will add that once inhabiting these suits, not having angelic power, they would require a craft (UFO) to travel.
Why have there been so many more UFO sightings recently? Angels and demons belong to a different, spiritual dimension. Marzulli believes people on Earth have been “opening a portal” to that dimension, and I must agree. Abortion (which is a type of human sacrifice); sexual immorality; rejection of God and his commandments; genetic engineering; genocidal wars; usurious banksterism; the rise of Satanism and satanic worship and rituals. All these things are separating us from God’s image and protection, and inviting the intrusion of these beings from the evil dimension. This is unsurprising since the Illuminist “Powers that Be,” who widely control governments, banking, industry and media, are themselves Luciferians who seek a world government, ruled by Satan from a throne in Jerusalem.
The long-awaited Antichrist will be a counterfeit Christ. He might be the ultimate Nephilim: the result of sexual union between Satan and a woman. In this way, the fallen one would counterfeit the birth of Christ, which resulted from the holy union between God and Mary.
I hope this post will, for some of my readers, add a new dimension to their understanding of spiritual phenomena, history and even the Bible itself.
A 9/11 Truther sent me a link to the following video discussion between Gary Stearman, L. A. Marzulli and Tom Horn. As it was what first stimulated my interest in the Flood-Nephilim-Alien relationship, I share it with my readers:
- Leonard C. Lewin, Report from Iron Mountain (1967, reprint; New York: The Free Press, 1996), 80-81.
- L. A. Marzulli, The Cosmic Chess Match (Spiral of Life, 2011), 29.
- L. A. Marzulli, On the Trail of the Nephilim, Vol. 1 (Spiral of Life, 2013), 103.
- Earnest Albert Hooton, Apes, Men and Morons (New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1937), 107.